Which Photo Sharing Social Media Channel is Right for your Brand?

The rise of ‘Brand Media’ creates an opportunity to use the Internet to speed the spread of high quality business intelligence internally, deliver specific and managed photo, video and other content directly to customers, consumers, journalists, lawmakers and other interested parties. It also provides a tool for crisis management, enhance its communications opportunities in the digital community of consumers and bloggers, and, as a by-product, create, manage and provide frictionless internal access to a rich media digital asset repository.

Flickr is but one of those channels. In and of itself, Flickr has little relevance if used carelessly or as a by-product or add-on. You shouldn’t merely dump images or video off and leave them as untitled. You need to program the channel, much like a news outlet programs the different segments. It cannot be your filing cabinet or content graveyard.

How can Flickr work against you?

1. If your brand page is dedicated to showcasing doughy executives conspiring to take each other to a jalapeno popper lunch, cigar smoking at the tailgate, beer pong-Fridays or anyone dressed up like a leprechaun on St. Patty’s Day.

2. If your brand page only consists of screen captures or images of your product placements in the media.

3. If you don’t designate an owner for the channel, who approves, commissions or otherwise takes responsibility for what is publically available. Resist the urge to share that photo of Beyonce at the next table. If it is relevant, give it to the person or team in charge of your social media.

4. Upload images once and let the channel get dusty. That only demonstrates you don’t really care about what is there.

5. If you don’t integrate the platform as part of your overall social media effort and calendar. Flickr is one of a myriad of platforms your brand needs to be utilizing.

These would just be a few ways Flickr (or any other sharing platform) would be not only useless, but also potentially damaging to your reputation, to potential and existing customers and even recruiting efforts. Someone over the age of 25 may not want to go to work at a frat house if they are serious about furthering their career.

How can Flickr be of most use for a brand?

1. It can support a wide variety of business/marketing objectives by showcasing the production process, the people who handle each part of the business and the world-class precision in which your brand conducts itself.

2. Building brand awareness and positioning within the sustainability community. If you are community minded, show your efforts. Help your audience understand your efforts to be considerate to the planet, the neighborhood and those who could most use your brand to do the same.

3. Driving sales consideration. Show new products, the creative process, the packaging or process. Let your audience have access, let them LIKE you.

4. Use the channel to recruit new employees. Show off the office, don’t show off the company clown on his scooter, the hot intern or the forced fun of a mandatory sack race.

5. Changing/improving consumer sentiment. Visually demonstrate what your brand is all about. If all you have to share are photos of people at happy hour, don’t. Your customer doesn’t care.

6. Showcase corporate culture in your sector of business. Do showcase how your organization is different in relevant ways. If you participate in Habitat for Humanity for example, let people know.

Now you might be asking, Why Flickr instead of a Facebook photo album or section of your website or blog? I wouldn’t necessarily say it is an either or proposition. Flickr is great for hi-resolution, keyword tagging, public facing, image embedding on you blog and photo community friendly, whereas Facebook is great for creating albums of content that can be tagged only with actual people and places. Flickr also provides more legal control over the usage of your images via Creative Commons. Simplified: keyword tagging vs names and public vs the option to privatize or selectively share. They are similar, but not alike and for me, the search-ability or Flickr (being discoverable) is of great importance.

I would also be remiss if I didn’t mention the latest hot property on the Internet: Pinterest. Pinterest is another great platform for sharing not only your content, but also content you feel may be of interest to others. So, having said that, the best use for Flickr is to upload your content, appropriately tag it and then perhaps as part of a distribution strategy, ‘pin’ it as a way to share it with your intended community.

Perhaps the most important take away might be to have motivation behind your effort. Use each platform appropriate to the type of content you are creating. Don’t start a Flickr channel because the Jones’s have one. Start using a platform or because you have a story to tell and want to support it, grown the audience, demonstrate quality, skill, fun and passion in your industry. Also bear in mind, you will want to effectively manage the data as well as protect content where appropriate. Make sure you have some sort of distribution strategy in place. After all, it might be great content, but it also has to be discoverable in this ever shifting arena of over sharing and ‘me too’ media.

About the Author
Tracy Shea is a veteran broadcast producer and digital innovator, who was part of the launch team for CNN.com, worked with revolutionaries at Wired Magazine and developed two screen interactive TV content before tablets evolved. He’s worked with brands including Starbucks, General Mills, Unilever, Pepsico and Ebay. Currently, he is Executive Producer in charge of program development for Toni On New York and provides digital/social media council for several agencies. Connect with him via @Broadbandito

 

Related Articles:

Advertisements

4 comments on “Which Photo Sharing Social Media Channel is Right for your Brand?

  1. Pinterest is a great way to spread your visual content, but you need to send people to your website. Sending them from Pinterest to FlickR first seems to make it less likely that they’ll go on to your site.

    • Rebecca, I would have agreed with you, say 5 years ago. However, the state of the Internet now is one of mobile, shared / recommended content. Brands have a home (website), Embassies (FB, Flickr, YouTube etc), and Outposts (Blogs, Forums etc) – so sending people directly to the website may not be the best next step unless you are asking people to ‘buy now’ – otherwise, you may consider asking people to interact with your content & your brand in ways that help spread your message to their interest groups and even their circle of influencers. Only after you build trust and relevance can you then ask for people to come ‘home’ and get to know you better. It’s a softer touch now than in 2001 when you could just direct people to your site and the ‘buy now’ button. If you are Amazon, that may be the best step, but if you are General Mills and you want people to understand your efforts in sustainability, the next step isn’t .com but perhaps to a blog, a video, or some other interactive experience that will educate, entertain and inform. They may never go to your website, but you have still conveyed the right message to the right audience and built relationship.

  2. Thank you for this article, it can often be accusing when you are trying to decide what angle/media channel to use. This is definitely a great resource to use and I definitely will use it when I start my next project.

  3. Newbieinpr feel free to get in touch, I always love to share ideas, and hear about what others are up to! Andrew is a great resource as well.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s